Not only are “TRIGGER POINTS” censorship, they’re bullying. Most kids are dying to find out who they really are, inside. They want to know who they were so they can find out who they are.
I remember thinking that back when I was in sixth grade, because I was short and skinny and chicken shit the school greaser in his leather jacket and ducktail bullied me and wanted to beat me up. He did. But a decade later, writing about it, I remembered why. I was a total obnoxious wise-ass. I had bullied him, taunting him unmercifully: “Ha ha. I’m smart, and you’re stupid.” Silly stuff, stupid stuff like that. “You have to say, ‘Bernie can beat me up, or I’ll tell Mrs. Christensen (the teacher) you cheated off my paper.’ ” That memory was in fact empowering, as well as enlightening. So where did my big mouth come from? What was the difference really between that and his thug-attitude? When Sergeant Bernie pinned on his safety patrol badge, guess who had to cross the street last? You got it. He couldn’t wait to beat me up. Who, in retrospect, could blame him? The whole thing, looking back, strikes me as quite funny, quite human. I wonder if, in retrospect, he would see it that way. The action between us I think he would. But was a more serious trauma behind his general attitude? I don’t know, but to one degree or another, We’re all victims, we’re all bullies, all human. The purpose of an education is to learn .
That’s our right.
The real bullies: “Trigger Points”. They’re the Joe McCarthy of our time.
Educators telling us we can’t learn?
Time for our bullying instincts to rise up. Time to fight back.
A false alarm is being sounded in literature classes:
“Avoid unnecessary ‘Trigger Points’, provide ‘trigger warnings’ to students.”
What is a ‘trigger’?
According to the policy, thankfully being re-examined, at Oberlin, “a ‘trigger’ is ‘something’ that recalls a traumatic event to an individual…’anything’ could be a trigger.”
To help the student identify and release “trigger points” was not only one of the major purposes of my junior high literature classes, but also my writing classes. The trigger points, unrealized, if at play only subconsciously, are the culprits behind not only “reader’s block” but “writer’s block”, to say nothing of self-destructive behavior. Trigger Points are inspired by real and important fears, but they are finally love-killers, “blocking”, if you will, fogging up the view not only of ourselves, but also of the people around us.
The purpose of literature is to help us all “To Thine Own Selves Be True”, profoundly true, so that whatever wisdom we have can flourish and grow.
Otherwise, it won’t, and we all suffer.
Denial is self-censorship, and it is more destructive than any provincial reactionary school board. If those trigger points go unchecked for too long, all of us are in danger.
As much as we all personally hate pain of any kind at all and will avoid it at all costs—at least I will—if we’re acting like assholes, and don’t know why, we’re going to scapegoat or blame others whether they deserve it or not.
Ironically, it often happens right in the middle of literature class. The student too passive and withdrawn in class discussions who blames her low evaluation on the eager, assertive student who speaks out, accusing her of “dominating” the discussion. The student whose view of a loving relationship between a child and his father in a story is skewed cynically only because, angry at his own, he’s envious. The put-down artist who turns away from Catcher In the Rye, claiming boredom, because she refuses to see herself in him. The pedant,the snob, the cynic who rolls his eyes at a classmate’s sincerely exuberant expression of passion.
On the playground: The 12 year old boy running around calling everyone a fag because he has a crush on his best friend.
At parties: The bully who picks on the sensitive kid he wishes he were strong enough to be.
What piece of art, what novel, what subject, what shared experience, what “trigger” gives them courage to face themselves, their self-denial and therefore others?
“The Beast is us,” says Simon, in Lord of the Flies, which makes him an angel, because he knows. Self-awareness humanizes him. It humanizes those who read him—which is to say, see him truly, as he is–instead of turning away. “The beast is us” is a trigger point.
Keeping the safety on leaves us all assholes.
And not just for the sake of the shooter do these trigger points need to be acknowledged, and at some point, released.
Click the link below to read the review…
CATEGORY: POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
SHOULD THE CHURCH BAN STRAIGHT PRIESTS ?
Clearly the sexual abuse of children is a problem here. I think the Church has no choice but to ban straight priests altogether. I’m not by any means saying that all straight ministers are pederasts. A few, here and there, are probably able to restrain themselves, perhaps even have no proclivities in that direction.
But how often do you hear of a gay minister sexually abusing children? You might say, well, Bernie, until recently at least,there weren’t any; they weren’t permitted to be ordained.
But that just further confirms their innocence, unless they were using drones. They weren’t there.
Straight priests, however, were there. And if we have to sacrifice some as collateral damage, they have only their fellow straight priests to blame, probably the most straight and the most narrow.
Have the cops give them the same test they use for drivers suspected to be Under The Influence, only with the cops looking for the opposite result. Isn’t that “profiling”? You bet it is. But if they walk the Straight and Narrow, book ‘em.
If they waver, steal their car and give it to me. Is the tank full? Check that out.
The point here is that Straight priests can no longer be trusted around our children.
In my home town here in Beaufort, SC, the Episcopaleans have fled the national church, i. e., seceded. The seccessionists only want straight priests–no gays–and not as slaves either. Don’t even think about that. Let’s not get too worked up and let our past overwhelm our present here.
But, hey, I’m suspicious. If the church is that homophobic, and they are, why?
Fanaticsm is denial. Maybe they’re afraid they’re gay and are afraid to admit it.
Worse, maybe they really are straight.